It's been a pretty crappy day, already, so don't make me decide which writing is more annoying, self-reflexive, and wilfully misinformed and misrepresentative about its subject:
- Lee Siegel's free-associational riffs in Slate about Cy Twombly's "doodling," which, after all these years IS apparently just like your kid could do. Bonus quote: "You cannot fully understand Twombly's art unless you know that he is gay." [huh?? I DID pick up "fatuous" from here, though.]
updated link: archive.org
- Hilton Kramer's self-contradictory, dishonest, and obtuse reading and critique of Pace Wildenstein's amazing show, "Logical Conclusions: 40 Years of Rule-Based Art." Kramer--why am I even mentioning him??--starts in on Minimalism, too. Oy. And the Communist Threat, blah blah blah. Save it for that big Flavin/Judd/Kramer panel discussion in the sky, Hilly. It's 2005 already.