greg.org – Page 2 – the making of, by greg allen

All In A Day’s Work

a screenshot of hauser & wirth's instagram of a video of a white go-go dancer in a very small silver speedo and sneakers, facing away from the camera, dancing to himself on a pale blue square platform ringed with soft white light bulbs, installed in a vast concrete convention center, with a scrim in the background, the messe, for art basel. a work by felix gonzalez-torres shown by a gallery that does not officially represent the artist — Felix Gonzalez-Torres’ *“Untitled” (Go-Go Dancing Platform)*, 1991, in what I think is a dress rehearsal at Art Basel Unlimited, where it is being shown by Hauser & Wirth, not Zwirner & Rosen. via ig/hauserwirth

Hauser & Wirth showing Felix Gonzalez-Torres’ “Untitled” (Go-Go Dancing Platform) at Art Basel Unlimited this week. Seeing a video on H&W’s insta of the dancer hopping off the platform and heading out of the halle, accompanied, like a Disneyland character, by a handler, reminds me of artist Pierre Bal-Blanc’s 1992 video work, Employment Contract.

Bal-Blanc was a go-go dancer for the 1992 installation of Felix’s work at the Kunstverein Hamburg, for a show called “Ethics and Aesthetics in times of AIDS.” Employment Contract is a wordless slice of Bal-Blanc’s life that happens to have a brief go-go dancing stint in the middle of it.

One of the tenets of “Untitled” (Go-Go Dancing Platform), reaffirmed just a couple of weeks ago when the Felix Gonzalez-Torres Foundation published an in-process version of core tenets for the work, is that the dancer’s schedule is their own, and it is undisclosed. The dancer chooses whether to share their schedule with the exhibitor, and the exhibitor is to take care not to disclose it, and to provide adequate accomodations for the dancer to go about their business. From the viewing, and even the exhibiting standpoint, this work of Felix’s entails a high degree of uncertainty, and a very low probability at any one moment of there being a dancer dancing.

screenshot of a 1992 video of a fit young white guy in black briefs and sneakers, seen from the back as he walks through a glossy floored gallery at the kunstverein in hamburg germany, the go-go dancer for felix gonzalez-torres' work, which was on view there for the third time ever. from a video art work by the dancer, pierre bal-blanc, via ubu — screenshot from Pierre Bal-Blanc’s *Employment Contract* (1992) via ubu

Bal-Blanc turns this sense of expectation entirely inside out. The video camera tracking him as he jogs through the streets of Hamburg gives no hint at all of what is to come; he’s just a guy, jogging, in jorts. The surreal absurdity of him walking into a museum, unlocking a supply closet, stripping down [to silver and black briefs, a kludgey two-tone outfit that would not pass muster with the Core Tenets crowd], and grooving in an empty gallery for several minutes, defies narrative logic. And yet he goes right on with it, and back out of the museum. All in a day’s work.

This question of context and expectation is one of the perennial sources of power for Felix’s work, especially this one. Encountering a go-go dancer in a museum might feel as disorienting as a pile of candy you can eat from. More than 30 years on, Hauser & Wirth’s instagram comments are somehow still full of people still confused or contemptuous of this work as art. And while art world folks have certainly consumed and processed Felix’s work fully, seeing this piece, from this gallery, at an art fair, the least wild thing about it is the dancer.

[next day update]: indeed, it looks like the Core Tenets got updated just in time, because the work that had been on “permanent loan” to the Museum St. Gallen is for sale by the Swiss collectors who’ve owned it all along. Donald Judd would not be surprised. It does make me want to take a new look at the five go-dancing platforms and lighted pedestals listed in the “non-works” section of the CR.

Maurice Darantiere, Ulysses Cover Proof

the final proof lithograph of the cover of james joyce's ulysses is a surprisingly brushy horizontal rectangle of blue, with the title and author's name on the right half. the proof is in the collection of the library at suny buffalo — Maurice Darantiere, Cover for *Ulysses* [final proof], 1922, lithograph, Poetry Collection of the University Libraries, University at Buffalo, the State University of New York, via The Morgan Library

I knew the story about Joyce wanting the cover for Ulysses to be the blue of the Greek flag. But I did not know that he ended up giving the little Greek flag hanging in Shakespeare & Co. to his artist friend, Myron Chester Nutting, to match the color.

I learned this from The Morgan Library’s online exhibition celebrating Ulysses‘ centenary, which includes the extraordinary lithograph above, the final proof for Joyce’s Ulysses cover, prepared by the Dijon printer Maurice Darantiere.

At first the bleed around the edge and the brushmarks made me wonder if there was an ur-monochrome painting, a Nutting original, but I think not. The stone or the plate was painted with a solid field, which Darantiere printed using ink prepared to Nutting’s specification. The title seems to be set in negative, masked so the unprinted paper shows through.

Maybe I must now make the entire cover, as printed, not just the front. I feel like it should match the dimensions of the book, and the page inside, but those bleeding edges do call to me. Either way, I obviously must make it like this now.

a diptych of the blue cover of the first edition of james joyce's ulysses on the left, and the frontispiece, with marsden hartley's inscription on the right. a study for a print by greg.org — *Study for Untitled (This copy of Ulysses belongs to me, Marsden Hartley), 2025, prints of some kind, 4to, 242 x 190 mm* [still trying out titles, obv]

And I have to get the color right. Is it best to match the modern color of Marsden Hartley’s copy? Is it even possible to match the original, given that they’re all 100 years old, too? Do I try to match the proof? Is it a Ulysses conservation standardbearer? Nutting apparently warned Joyce that the blue would fade, and it did?

a 1934 illustration from a greek encyclopedia of a bunch of variations of the greek flag, which is a paler, cornflower blue than the contemporary version. via wikipedia — Administrative Flags of Greece (1934) via wikipedia

I’ve seen discussion of Joyce’s Greek flag blue not actually matching the Greek flag’s blue, that perhaps the Shakespeare & Co. flag had faded, as well as the books. But Ulysses matches the color of the Greek flags reproduced in this 1934 encyclopedia plate. Honestly, I can see the appeal.

Getting the Right Blue on the Cover [themorgan.org via @mclees-fiona via @joshuajfriedman]
Previously, related: Untitled (Joyce Hartley), 2025
At least Luigi Lucioni got his copy of Ulysses back

Tania Bruguera Terror Chic

two tshirts, a mirror, and an olive green canvas all printed with tania bruguera's 2005 slogan, never forget your first revolution. from terror chic, by editions schellmann — Tania Bruguera, Terror Chic, 2005, ink on t-shirts, shoulder bag, mirror, canvas, ed. 50, published for the 51st Venice Biennale by Editions Schellmann

Coming in 2005, smack in the middle of the Global War On Terror™, the 51st Venice Biennale may have been #toosoon for Tania Bruguera to drop two editions named Terror Chic. Twenty years and a few revolutions in, let’s see how it’s going.

One edition is what we might now call the Terror Chic Capsule Collection: a group of fifty objects—mirrors, messenger bags, t-shirts, stretched canvases—each printed with what Edition Schellmann calls Bruguera’s “thought-provoking slogan, ‘NEVER FORGET YOUR FIRST REVOLUTION.'”

a metal stencil with the phrase never forget your first revolution punched out in all caps in the center, an edition by tania bruguera from 2005 titled terror chic, published by editions schellmann — Tania Bruguera, Terror Chic, 2005, metal stencil, 26 x 55.5 cm, ed. 200, published for the 51st Venice Biennale by Editions Schellmann

The other is more interesting: a Terror Chic metal stencil in an edition of 200, “to be used to print slogan on T-shirt, bag, wall, car, or any other object.” Now we’re talking. Bruguera’s stencil hasn’t even sold out yet, but it’s efficiency and durability have surely already spawned several revolutions, as well as a whole trend of fundraising edition stencils.

Meanwhile, if you’re in the market, never forget to shop around. The revolution can be had with a vip discount.

Wade Guyton Beyeler Facsimile Objects

an installation view of eight wade guyton paintings in a row on two walls of a beyeler foundation gallery in basel, with a bright lightbox grid ceiling and a pale wood floor, one of renzo piano's museum gems that got him into the museum manufacturing business — Untitled WG5703 and WG5707, Guytons from 2024 installed at the Fondation Beyeler in 2025

The Fondation Beyeler has just come out with your first Art Basel impulse purchase: two full-scale Wade Guyton prints of paintings showing at the Beyeler right now. Around here we’d call them facsimile objects, but they are very much what Wade does and how he does it.

two mostly identical black and white artworks photographed in black and white against a white wall: a painting of a giant, misprinted capital x on a stretched canvas sitting on two little blocks is on the left, and the fundraising poster version of it, same size but with creases from being handfolded, and on paper, is on the right. the last of six fundraising edition posters by wade guyton for printed matter, 2019 — X Poster (Untitled, 2007, Epson UltraChrome inkjet on linen, 84 x 69 inches, WG1211), 2019, UV-resistant ink on paper on the right and, presumably, actual Untitled, 2007, Epson UltraChrome inkjet on linen, 84 x 69 inches, WG1211 on the left. image via PrintedMatter

For six years, from 2014-19, Guyton made full-scale print facsimiles of his paintings as fundraising editions for Printed Matter. They were all posters of earlier black X-on-white paintings, and folding them by hand felt like part of the concept. From the proofs installed at the Beyeler, that does not seem to be the case anymore. These look as flat as the day they rolled off the Epson.

three white women in swiss festive clothing stand in front of two wade guyton prints that reproduce two paintings at full scale. the abstract one on the left in red and black uses a photo of the artist's studio floor; the one on the right is a scan of an x painting. both have been digitally manipulated. they are in thin steel frames in the lobby space of a museum, the fondation beyeler, in basel in 2025 — [L] *Untitled (Untitled, 2024, Epson UltraChrome HDX inkjet on linen, 84 x 69 inches, WG5703),* 2025, and [R] *Untitled (Untitled, 2024, Epson UltraChrome HDX inkjet on linen, 84 x 69 inches, WG5707),* 2025: I see floating, I see margins, I see reflectivity-induced subjectivity, I see no creases in these Buyeler editions whose “**estimated delivery date is mid-November 2025**” [bold in the original]

TFW I thought I’d seen these before, not just at the Beyeler, and I was like, “Duh, that’s his MO.” But no, I don’t mean in the “all Guytons look alike” mode. I mean in the sense that I felt like I’d seen these paintings before, at Guyton’s 2023 show at Matthew Marks. The X painting, WG5707, depicts a different scan of a different, earlier X painting than the one at Marks. And in fact, the 2024 Beyeler painting in the 2025 Beyeler print has striations that look like a photo of a monitor of a scan of a transparency of a painting, rather than just a scan of a transparency of a painting.

a thin grey line and white border around this image of a wade guyton painting of a photo of the artist's studio floor indicates that it is a print of that painting. the photo for the painting has been manipulated to highlight the dark blacks and reds in the worn and often-repainted floor. the painting is on view at the beyeler, who is selling this print edition in 2025 — the jpg rendering of the 2025 print of the 2024 Beyeler painting, WG5703

But the other one, WG5703, the photo of Guyton’s studio floor, is, in fact, the same photo, though not the same painting.

a wade guyton painting from 2023 of layers of worn paint on the floor of his studio. the abstract striated pattern looks like a richter squeegee painting or a clyfford still in composition. the saturated red, green, and black patches read as paint colors, but it turns out the artist alters the colors before printing his canvases. this variation was shown at matthew marks in 2023 — Guyton’s Untitled (WG5546), 2023, inkjet on linen, 84 x 69 in., was at Matthew Marks in 2023

Guyton likes to paint, photograph, and repaint the floor of his studio, and these Clyfford Still-like layered abstractions are the glorious result. But what these two paintings show is not found wear & tear. The tape, the shoe[?] in the lower left corner, the separations [not just layering, it turns out] of color. This is the same photo, in different states, printed on canvas, twice. Three times, actually; the Beyeler already has another variation from 2021.

For a long time, Guyton was known to use the same files [.doc, .tiff], and give attention to the accidents and variations of the printing process. He staged multiple shows with identical layouts of images made from the same monochrome image, bigblack.tiff, and even sent five nearly identical paintings to his five dealers spread out around the Messe at Basel.

But from observing these little differences in the same content, Guyton has expanded his source image folder to include screenshots of the Times, and photos of his studio, his work, and his life. His 2021 show at Marks in LA included images of Guyton recording his temperature. In 2023 there were paintings made of photos of protests, and a Manet ham.

As the vagaries of printing become absorbed into the language of his work, Guyton has expanded what he says by making work of what he sees. His work, his shows, images, and the world around him, have all become animating subjects of his mature process. Mature, but not static; processes are revealed in between the finding and the printing. As these two floor paintings show, the images flowing around him may also be manipulated, altered, and created.

At first I thought the recursiveness was new, too, but I think it was always there; the works, their shifting formats, their nested titles, their numbering system, all make us aware of the artist’s awareness. The beauty of that churn, that cycle, of making and showing and remaking, is a compelling subject for at least a hundred people going to Basel for the 20th or 30th time for buying and selling. One hundred plus ten artist proofs.

A Pile of White House Bricks

a pile of 18th and early 19th century bricks in a variety of finishes sits in a five-layer stack on the floor of a rural virginia auction house. a manila envelope on top of them has white house brick documents 166 bricks written on it. because these bricks are from the white house.

What’s that, you say?

VERY RARE HISTORICALLY IMPORTANT COLLECTION OF WHITE HOUSE BRICKS?

I AM LISTENING.

Enslaved people made the bricks for the White House from clay on or near the White House grounds at least twice. After the White House was burned in 1812, most of the original 1792 bricks were too damaged to use in the 1814-17 reconstruction. The 1817 bricks were removed during the 1948-52 gut reconstruction of the White House by President Harry s. Truman. 95,000 went for projects at Mount Vernon. 10,000 went to a project at Fort Myer. A New York congressman bought White House bricks left over from the Fort Myer pile, along with 1600 lbs of White House stone, and stored it at some guy’s farm for a while. When came to pick up most of it, he left this lot of 166 bricks. “This may very well be one of the last large groups of White House bricks in public hands,” says the Shenandoah Valley auctioneer Jeffrey S. Evans.

I’m trying to imagine the excitement if these original White House bricks were returned to the White House, or if they were exhibited publicly near the White House today. Or tomorrow.

The bricks will be auctioned June 28, 2025.

Lot 2124 | VERY RARE HISTORICALLY IMPORTANT COLLECTION OF WHITE HOUSE BRICKS, est $10-20,000 [jeffreysevans]
Previously, related: Untitled (George Washington’s Coffin), 2016

[few minutes later update: It’s my brick in a box]

Two Metal Things At Christie’s

an alexander calder necklace of steel wire, in twelve segments, tightly coiled around a cord, with one end of the wire twisted into a short, stumpy spiral of one or two turns, and the longer end twisted into a medallion-sized spiral. some are tight, swirled to the center, others are open at the center, one has a squiggle, and one, at the front center, forms a flower with a central tiny spiral, surrounded by a circle. made in 1938, anne bass bought it in 1972, i guess in her hippie era. she died and now (in june 2025) it is for sale at christie's. at the moment of this typing there is one bid for $100,000. — Alexander Calder, Encircled Star, 1938, steel & brass wire on cord, being sold from the online portion of Anne Bass’s NYC estate sale at Christie’s [update: sold for USD441,000]

According to the Alexander Calder Foundation, there were 61 pieces of jewelry included in the artist’s first retrospective, Calder Mobiles, at the George Walter Vincent Smith Gallery in Springfield, Massachusetts, in November 1938. Was Encircled Star, 1938, among them? Christie’s doesn’t say. All they know is that Anne Bass bought it in 1972, when she was 31.

an alexander calder necklace of flattened gold wire from 1937 is laid out flat in a circle. strips of gold wire twisted around a central cord are alternately turned into flattened spirals, or left straight, so they radiate outward. laid flat like this, it looks like a child's drawing of the sun. from the calder foundation — Alexander Calder, necklace, 1937, gold wire and cord, via calder.org

It is also not clear whether the similar necklace from 1937, in gold wire instead of steel, was not available, or if Bass figured steel was safer for wearing on the subway in the 70s.

how can this be an inkwell? it is gilt bronze, with three inkpots with lids on a ring of raised legs, but the dominant aspect of it is the extremely ornate leafy asymmetrical flourishes that make it look like a spider robot or something. it is from 1740 in france, probably, though according to christie's paris, this style was also popular with aristos in germany and england at the time. this inkpot probably started the revolution, tho, as soon as some peasant saw it — Encrier d’Époque Louis XV, 1740, gilt bronze, H 27 cm, selling 19 June 2025 at Christie’s Paris [update: ou pas! it did not sell]

And speaking of celebrated metalwork of the ruling class, this rocaille inkwell. Holy moley, how is this real? It has resulted in the following words, a kind of poetry, at once luxurious and terrible, which I reproduce here in French and translation:

Nan Goldin Time-Limited Benefit Prints for Trans Justice

nan goldin's 1991 photo of jimmy paulette at wigstock is a bust portrait of jimmy paul's femme persona, in a fine white mesh top and a blonde updo wig with bangs.behind is a crowd of wigstock bodies: a figure in a tight red lamé evening gown; a white muscly guy with his shirt off and back turned, someone in a turquoise shirt. an iconic goldin image — Nan Goldin, Jimmy Paulette at Wigstock, 1993, 5×7 in., open edition, signed, through 26 June 2025 via Leslie Lohman

Nan Goldin has published two prints to raise money for trans justice-related organizations: the Leslie Lohman Museum, the Sylvia Rivera Law Project, and the Trans Income Project.

One’s Wigstock era iconic, the other pandemic freshness. They’re available through June 26, 2025. [leslielohman via hyperallergic]

Campbell Kids From Ed Ruscha

ed ruscha study in oil on paper is a square of deep blue surrounding three fat capital letters in yellow: OOF, which he made into a painting, which was made into a hoodie at moma. this one's at the national gallery tho — Ed Ruscha, study for OOF, 1962, oil and pastel, probably 12 x 11 in. or so, via the National Gallery of Art

The National Gallery has acquired an incredible study for Ed Ruscha’s OOF, but, amazingly, that is not important now. Because on the back is this:

an illustration of two cherubic children dressed as little chefs marching with a giant spoon, the campbell kids were marketing mascots for the soup company, here appropriated by ed ruscha, or rather, ed ruscha made a study on a leftover lithograph of this soup ad. now at the national gallery — Aux armes, les citoyens! verso, from Ed Ruscha, it says

These are the Campbell Kids, used to sell soup. What are they doing on the back of Ed Ruscha’s study? I think they were left over from his 1960 Christmas card.

two cherubic pug nosed kids with fake mustaches and chef outfits are prancing while holding a soup spoon, campbell soup mascots repurposed into a christmas card by ed ruscha whose handwriting above reads have a soup super season, in a mix of ink/lithography and watercolor paint. this one sold at swann in 2019 — Ed Ruscha, paint on litho, 1960, 14 1/4 x 10 3/4 in,. sold at Swann in 2019 as part of a Ruscha grab bag

This one sold at Swann along with a whole stack of Ruscha deepcuts. The Campbell Kids have been lifted from a print illustration, obviously, but seeing them both, it turns out the “From Ed Ruscha” handwriting is printed, too.

Amazingly, there is another one coming up for sale, if the emperor allows it, in Los Angeles in two weeks. So the OOF sheet had the “Have a soup super” trimmed off. How long did Ruscha use his leftovers as scratch paper? Are there Campbell Kids on the verso of any other drawings? So many questions!

What I do know is that this LA Modern image, without the OOF oil soaking through, will be easier to make a t-shirt from. Stay tuned.

Jenny Holzer Calligraphy

a jenny holzer silkscreen print in silver ink with palladium leaf on light gray paper that reads all things are delicately interconnected, in an exuberant calligraphic style surrounded by swirly calligraphic flourishes that fill the whole paper. made in 2020, selling at phillips in 2025 — Jenny Holzer, delicately interconnected, 2020, palladium leaf on silkscreen ink on paper, 18 x 22 in., ed. 100+15 APs, this one selling at Phillips on 24 June 2025

In April 2020 I was not quick enough—nor, tbqh motivated enough—to run down one of the prints Jenny Holzer created for Hauser & Wirth as a fundraiser for Earth Day, which then also became a fundraiser for the WHO’s emergency COVID response. But since then, their unabashed etsy calligraphy has really grown on me, and makes me want to see “Live Love Laugh” carved into an exotic granite bench.

Fortunately, all 100 original buyers were flippers, because they come up for sale pretty regularly, unframed. And, after donating portion of the proceeds to support auction houses in need, they usually get most of their original purchase price back. A good reminder for anyone in the Holzer benefit print racket: the houses and the Hausers always win.

Don’t Piss On Me And Tell Me It’s Painting

a vertically oriented painting with a copper metallic background, and splotches and spray patterns of oxidized green where someone pissed on the paint while it was still wet. this warhol oxidation painting was sold at christie's in 2008, and is on view at skarstedt in nyc in 2025 — Andy Warhol, *Oxidation Painting*, 1978, urine on copper paint on canvas, 76 x 52 in., as sold at Christie’s in 2008

I’ve heard in the long run they stink, but then, so does Versailles. I do like Warhol’s Oxidation Paintings, though. I like how they went from Piss Paintings to Oxidation Paintings as their critical discourse expanded and their market value increased. How a taxonomy developed, where Piss Paintings are just the ones with piss on gesso.

I like how my sporadic attempts to research the Oxidation Paintings reveals that almost every piece of writing about them longer than a caption is the same. They use the same journal quotes about Ronnie Cutrone and vitamin B; the same Pollock, Duchamp, Mapplethorpe references; the same washed up comeback narrative, recovering from the same celebrity portraitist dismissals.

Is this all there is? Or is this all there is that keeps the market open and prices up?

Skarstedt has a show of Oxidation Paintings up right now in Chelsea that includes the painting above, which sold at Christie’s in 2008 for $1.899m, more than 50% above its high estimate. So I guess the text is working?

From the press release: “[The show] offers a glimpse into a moment when Warhol, often perceived as emotionally remote or mechanically detached, engaged with the most intimate forms of mark-making. And it reminds us that beneath the surface, there is always a question of presence, of process, and of transformation.”

warhol oxidation painting but turned the opposite side up from the one above. via skarstedt 2025 — Andy Warhol, Oxidation Painting, 76 x 52 in., turned the other way, via Skarstedt via Phillips

Indeed, how were these paintings actually made? If it’s as straightforward as they seem, why did Warhol say it was so difficult? Do vitamins or other intake really affect the color outcome? Has someone tried to replicate these? And how does a painting made on the floor get a top and a bottom? Because Skarstedt is showing this one turned the other way, as Phillips did in 2022 .

[Morning after update:] greg.org hero Christian Oldham reminds us that Sturtevant had a great story about Warhol asking her to make one of his piss paintings, and she said, “Andy I don’t have the right equipment.” The rest I’ll leave to her.

Destroyed Donald Judd

on the terrazzo ramp of the guggenheim museum sit two concentric circles of waist-high steel. the inner circle is of uniform height and thus follows the slant of the floor. the base of the outer circle is at an angle that matches the 3% grade of the ramp, leaving the top level. the discrepancy between the two is subtle but quite apparent. donald judd made this sculpture for the 1971 guggenheim international this photo was from an artforum review. — Donald Judd, Untitled, 1971, 32 3/4 in. x 15 ft diameter, hot rolled steel, as installed at the Guggenheim International, via artforum

Donald Judd was extremely critical of the Guggenheim for, among many things, not buying art from him and other artists over the years. In 1990, around the time of the Guggenheim’s controversial acquisition of works from Giuseppe Panza, Judd wrote about participating in the Guggenheim International:

The one time that I’ve been involved with the Guggenheim is that for one mass exhibition I made a circular work of steel for the ramp in an attempt to deal with and acknowledge F.L. Wright’s architecture, which the museum itself is now desecrating, meanwhile, contrarily, expanding north and overseas. Despite my warning, this work was sold over a summer by Joe Helman to someone in St. Louis, who in passing on, passed it along to the Guggenheim, which evidently concluded that the work and the owner should remain together and stored it outdoors to irreparably rust. Years went by. Then last year Diane Waldman wrote that the museum wanted me to remake the piece. Well, the museum destroyed a work of art. Should the artist make good? I don’t want to have my work in Count (1940) Giuseppe Panza di Biumo’s Collection in the Guggenheim Museum and in its corporate departments of mass MOCA, Salzburg and Venice. I don’t share the attitudes back of this kind of behavior.

The 15-ft diameter work, above, comprised two concentric circles of steel. The inner one was of uniform height. The base of the outer circle matched the 3% grade of the Guggenheim’s ramp, and so the top appeared to be level. This discrepancy created an interesting tension and instability, even in an old photo. This image ran in an issue of Artforum with Richard Serra’s similarly round, steel, and site-specific work embedded in the pavement on 183rd St in the Bronx, on the cover. [Serra made it for the 1971 Whitney Annual.]

And besides the torqued ellipses, obviously, Judd’s sloped work also reminded me of a steel wedge Serra made for a ramp in what used to be a loading dock at Gagosian’s 24th St space. And the whole point of mentioning it here is that leaving the work outside to rot and then assuming the artist will remake it for you is almost exactly what happened with Cady Noland’s Log Cabin.

This circular Judd is not on the Guggenheim’s collection list at the moment.

40,000 Words By Or About Donald Judd

Donald Judd’s “Una Stanza Per Panza” is a fascinating, rambling, exasperated defense of the primacy of the artist in making and making decisions about his work, threaded through a fierce, bitchy, gossipy rant about the pomposity and presumptuousness of problematic and profiteering collectors. And dealers. And museums. Some museums. The ones who didn’t support working artists for decades, but who then give tens of millions of dollars to a collector who made grand, hollow promises to hoover up works on the cheap.

It was all driven by the years-long conflict with Giuseppe Panza over the terms for realizing artworks, sold by Leo Castelli as certificates or plans on paper. Judd’s understanding was that these were permanent, site-specific installations to be constructed under his supervision. Panza saw them as authorizations to make Judd sculptures when and where he desired, including making local copies for museums, and for sale. The evolving realization [sic] of how far apart these views of art were is a subcurrent of Judd’s 25,000+ word text. Though whatever his position at any given moment or paragraph, Judd never wavers in his own rightness.

Johns In Paris

a framed poster of a 1961 jasper johns exhibit in paris is dominated by a reproduction of a johns lithograph, 0-9, with all the numbers drawn over each other. the show was at galerie rive droite in paris. — Jasper Johns 1961 exhibition poster, 74 x 46.3 cm, as sold by Thomaston Auction in 2022

Even MoMA lists it as 1960, and they got their copy from the artist in 1961, so maybe. But the exhibition being announced here, Jasper Johns’s first show in Europe, absolutely took place in the Summer of 1961.

0-9 is a 1960 lithograph by jasper johns where the digits 0 through 9 are drawn over each other in a nearly illegible cacophony of lines. this copy of the print was sold at craig starr gallery in 2004 — Jasper Johns, *0-9*, 1960, 30 x 22 in., showed in Craig Starr’s first show in 2004

I get the confusion, though. Because the poster—most were actually mailers—reproduces a Johns lithograph, signature, date, edition number and all. 0-9 (ULAE 3), 1960, was published in an edition of 35. And whoever got No. 28 photographed it for this poster. Did the Galerie Rive Droite produce the poster, with Johns’s name in his already distinctive stencil? Or was it made in the US? That freeform accent over the Saint-Honoré makes me wonder. In any case, it has a nearly uniform handmade elegance that belies its offset print reality.

a 1961 sculp-metal collage by jasper johns of the numbers 0 thru 9 cut out of this putty/aluminum powder material, and laid on top of each other in a way that their overlaps and layers come through while the color of the surface is a nearly uniform but slightly shiny medium gray. this sold at christie's in 2024 — Jasper Johns, 0-9, 1961, sculp-metal and collage on canvas, 67.6 x 54.2 cm, originally shown at Galerie Rive Droite, and sold in 2024 at Christie’s

Galerie Rive Droite was around the corner from the US Embassy where, in the week after his opening, Johns, Rauschenberg, Jean Tinguely, and Niki de St-Phalle organized an art-filled performance for pianist David Tudor. June 20, 1961.

a mostly grey toned painting in encaustic by jasper johns has 15' (minutes) entr'acte stenciled/traced into the bottom third of the canvas, a reference to intermission at the performance art event johns participated in at the us embassy in paris on 20 june 2025. now in the museum ludwig — Jasper Johns, *Entr’Acte*, 1961, encaustic & collage on canvas, 92 x 65 cm, currently the Collection Ludwig

Johns sent flowers in the shape of a target* and whipped up a painting in the Paris studio of Alabamian ceramist Fance Franck. Though there was no actual intermission and the action never stopped, Entr’Acte was placed on stage for 15 minutes. Like the Sculp-metal 0-9 collage in the exhibition, Entr’Acte was bought by the secretary at Galerie Rive Droite, Georges Marci.

But was it really? To Google her now, Georges Marci shows up in the provenance of various blue chip artworks, is repeatedly called the “grand dame of contemporary art in Switzerland,” which has to be a self-anointed thing, and is known for opening the first gallery in Gstaad. But I guess people never thought the tapes would be made public, because in her 1974 oral history for the Archives of American Art, dealer Judith Richardson basically called Marci a thief who murdered her husband.

Richardson worked for both Sidney Janis and Ileana Sonnabend, Castelli’s ex. Which meant she worked with many overlapping artists with Galerie Rive Droite, run by Jean Lecarde. Lecarde wanted to open a gallery in Switzerland, and to get around the residency requirements, he transferred all the inventory to Marci’s name. And then she just froze him out and kept it, and he went bankrupt. This is how Arman tells the story, Richardson said. Arman was there, she said he said, when Marci set her depressed Egyptian husband up with the pills he used to kill himself. And then she got all his Coptic art.

Anyway, where were we? Johns found encaustic in Paris, borrowed a studio, and made this painting in like a day or two. While also finding time with Bob to shoot some paintings at St Phalle’s. Eric Doeringer just saw one at the Tate, shot by both Rauschenberg and Johns, and texted me about it. Turns out it was in St Phalle’s show that opened June 30, 1961. A busy summer in Paris.

Previously, related: The Performance Art in Embassies Program
* I have long wanted to see, then make, this flower arrangement, but I can’t remember where I’ve ever seen a photo of it. Somewhere, though. I’ll look.

In her MoMA retrospective, Leah Dickerman had a photo of Rauschenberg painting on stage while David Tudor played the piano. But she also said Johns carried his painting on stage to signal intermission, while Tomkins said Johns refused to go on stage. Both could somehow be true.

a 1961 shunk & kender photo of a 1m or larger square flower arrangement in the form a jasper johns target sits on a stage in paris, a grand piano in the rear left, and robert rauschenberg and jean tinguely in between curtains and backdrops on the right, from jasper johns's catalogue raisonne, vol. 5 — Shunk & Kender, is there anyplace you weren’t in the 60s? Jasper Johns’ *Floral Target*, 1961, at David Tudor’s performance of Cage’s Variations II in Paris, via Roberta Bernstein’s chronology in JJ CR, vol 5

I knew I’d seen it somewhere. A closer look at Roberta Bernstein’s chronology shows Johns was booked and very busy in Paris: he made two plaster casts** in Tinguely’s studio; his costumes appeared on Merce dancers June 12; his show opened June 13; Tudor’s performance on the 20th; and he helped install Saint-Phalle’s show, which opened on the 28th. Also, what part of this itinerary did Shunk & Kender plan to be there for? Because it is amazing that they were around for an impromptu concert that came together in a matter of weeks.

** About those plaster casts: they were made from moulages made of the sculp-metal 0-9 and a similar Figure 3 from the Rive Droite show. So a 2nd generation cast. Which Johns used to promptly cast four more 0-9 in aluminum and, in 1997, four Fig. 3 in bronze. I low-key love that this feels like Johns wanting to keep engaged with works of his own that he expects not to see again, at least for a while.

Five Friends? Nine Friends

a black and white souvenir photo from 1958 of two white men in suits, john cage and karlheinz stockhausen, with their left arms draped over the edge of a painted cardboard picture of a junker plane, as if they're riding in an open car. the plane image is composited above a landscape photo of a ferry on the rhine, with the iconic ruins of a medieval castle on top of the famous mountain, drachenfels in the background. the whole image is blurry as if it's been copied and reprinted several times over. from october magazine, august 1997

Not only did they go back, they brought all their friends.

When I posted this 1958 souvenir photo of John Cage and Karlheinz Stockhausen flying over the romantische ruins of the castle at Drachenfels, I thought it’d be a stretch to make too contemporary a connection. And so I didn’t mention the landmark exhibition, Five Friends: John Cage, Merce Cunningham, Jasper Johns, Robert Rauschenberg, Cy Twombly which is on right now at the Museum Brandhorst in Münich. It’s the first exhibition to look at the work of these five as a tightly interrelated group of queer artists in an intense cultural moment.

And then Bluesky blew my mind when Michael Lobel and Michael Seiwert both posted this photo:

a black and white tourist photo of nine white ppl crowded into and around a fake helicopter photo backdrop from drachenfels on the rhine in germany. inside the chopper are carolyn brown, merce cunningham, john cage, mrs stockhausen whose name i forget, david tudor, and michael von biel. underneath the helicopter, because they wouldn't fit, are steve paxton, karlheinz stockhausen, and robert rauschenberg. paxton, brown, and a couple of other folks are holding glasses of beer. this photo was taken on a world tour of merce's dance company — Inside: Carolyn Brown, Merce Cunningham, John Cage, Doris Stockhausen, David Tudor, Michael von Biel; Underneath: Steve Paxton, Karlheinz Stockhausen, Robert Rauschenberg, a 1964 photo from Königswinter at the Robert Rauschenberg Foundation, via Museum-Brandhorst

The 1958 photo reminded Lobel that he’d seen this larger group shot in a 2016 Rauschenberg essay at Tate. Seiwert noticed it because it’s IN the Brandhorst exhibit.

Germans see this 1964 photo taken during a Merce Cunningham Dance Company world tour and are like, Mein Volks! The Tate caption incorrectly says it’s from Cologne, but it’s got Drachenfels written right on the helicopter. Seiwert points out that in 1964, Stockhausen was living near Königswinter and Bonn, the capital of West Germany, so it would have been an obvious destination for our intrepid dance troupe.

Meanwhile Jasper Johns was at home, painting.

Five Friends runs through 17 August 2025 at the Museum Brandhorst [museum-brandhorst.de]

I Would Benefit From Seeing This Cady Noland

screenshot of matthew higgs instagram where he posted a photo of a late 1990s checklist for a white columns benefit auction, specifically the 1992 work donated by cady noland titled we are all sanpaku, paint on metal, 24 x 36 x 1/8 in., courtesy of the artist, estimated value $4000, opening bid $3000. not clear what it is or if it sold. the caption is an announcement of the 2025 auction on june 26 via matthewhiggs2015

White Columns’ archives have a lot of amazing stuff, but not all of it. Director Matthew Higgs regularly posts outtake gems to his instagram, like he did yesterday when he announced the upcoming White Columns Benefit Auction (June 26, tickets and exhibition start next Friday) by posting some pics of previous benefit auction checklists.

Like this one from at least 1996, when Cady Noland donated a work from 1992 that does not appear anywhere else in the public record. What is/was it? A cozily sized screenprint on aluminum, sure, but of what?

We Are All Sanpaku is a phrase that probably felt so culturally obvious at one point that it was hard to imagine having to explain it. But We Are All Sanpaku’s moment was not 1992. It had already reached New Yorker cartoon punchline by 1985. Nixon was sanpaku, and—most crucially here, I think—Charles Manson was sanpaku, too.

We Are All Sanpaku is the despairing public’s confessional response to the 1965 declaration, You Are All Sanpaku, a best-selling book on Japanese physiognomy and macrobiotic diets by a guy with at least six aliases, including Georges Ohsawa. Sanpaku, three whites, is when the sclera, or white of your eye, is visible on three sides of the iris, rather than the normal [sic] two. Like your blood type and being born in the year of the goat, sanpaku has dire health, psychological and prophetic implications.

After diagnosing the western world—and the most prominent people in the news in the 1960s and 70s, including JFK, Marilyn Monroe, John Lennon, Nixon, and Manson—with not meeting Japanese beauty standards, Ohsawa said it could be cured with brown rice.

dust jacket of the 1965 edition of you are all sanpaku, written in red non-serif type above a charcoal drawing of a scowling, left eye with dark circles and more red text in the center, to make the point that sanpaku, having white below your iris, means you're evil or sick, and need brown rice — Sakurazawa Nyoiti is just one of his names

Which, whatever, my point here is that the aesthetic possibilities of what Noland painted on that metal sheet are a rich feast, and I want to see it. Charles Manson’s mugshot that ran on the cover of LIFE? The ominous eye from the first edition dust jacket? Nixon? In the spirit of sanpaku, I might just make something up and pretend it’s real.